June 30, 2003

Idle Thoughts

Which is worse, having nothing to lose, or nothing to gain?

If a person drinks too much beer, do they become beerational?

Posted by buggy at June 30, 2003 09:35 PM
Comments

An easier way to look at this: (nothing to lose): something to gain or (nothing to gain): something to lose. When faced with it in this light, it becomes clear that the choice is to have something to gain rather than something to lose. Or rather, to choose nothing to lose than nothing to gain.

Posted by: conversion killer on July 1, 2003 06:15 AM

Speaking as someone who drinks too much beer, the answer is clearly yes, since beer is rational. Granted, the consumer thereof may not be, but that's a different matter entirely.

Posted by: joh3n on July 1, 2003 09:32 AM

I'm sure that at some point we have all consumed irrational quantities of beer. That is, quantities of beer which cannot be expressed as the ratio of two integers. Clearly the absence of such quantities would greatly complicate any recipes for beer pi(e).

Posted by: persimmon on July 1, 2003 04:27 PM

It is worse to have nothing to lose. Having nothing to gain implies that you might have already gained it all.

Pardon me while I go buy a lottery ticket.

Posted by: teria on July 1, 2003 09:55 PM

To be contrary, second question first: Yes. Drinking too much beer makes you as rational as you can be after drinking too much beer, hence, beerational. See also, beer goggles.

My answer to the first question: it would be worse to have nothing to gain, because I would have no motivation to get up in the morning. YMMV, but that's what keeps me going, the idea that each day provides the opportunity for some kind of gain. If I've got it all and have nothing more to learn, I might as well be dead.

Posted by: buggy on July 3, 2003 08:56 AM
Post a comment